The successive projection algorithm (SPA) solves quadratic optimization problems under linear equality and inequality restrictions. That is, given a vector x, find the vector x* that minimizes the weighted Euclidian distance (x − x*)TW(x − x*), subject to Ax* ≤ b. Here, W is a diagonal matrix with positive weights. The system of restrictions can contain equality and/or inequality restrictions.
Suppose we have the vecor (x, y) = (0.8, −0.2), depicted by the black dot in the figure below. Furthermore, we have the demands that
$$ \begin{array}{lcl} y &\geq& x\\ x &\geq& 1-y \end{array} $$ The regions where y ≥ x or x ≥ 1 − y are indicated by the single-shaded regions in the figure. The area where both demands are satisfied is indicated by the doubly-shaded region.
To find a solution, the successive projection algorithm projects the start vector iterativelty on the borders of the convex region that is defined by the linear inequalities. In the figure this is indicated by the arrows. The solution is a point on or numerically very near the border of the allowed region.
When all weights on the diagonal of W are equal, projections are orthogonal, as shown in the figure. If the weights differ, the direction of projections will be scaled accordingly.
In the lintools
package, all inequalities must be
written in the ≤-form. So first note
that the above constraints can be written as $$
\left(\begin{array}{cc}
1 & -1\\
1 & 1\\
\end{array}\right)
\left(\begin{array}{c}
x\\y
\end{array}\right)
\leq
\left(\begin{array}{c}
0\\
1
\end{array}\right)
$$
So we formulate the problem with the lintools
package as
follows.
The function project
solves the problem for us. By
passing neq=0
we tell project
that every
restriction is an inequality (setting neq>0
means that
the first neq
restrictions are equalities).
## $x
## [1] 0.5 0.5
##
## $status
## [1] 0
##
## $eps
## NULL
##
## $iterations
## [1] 2
##
## $duration
## user system elapsed
## 0 0 0
##
## $objective
## [1] 0.7615773
The result is a list with the following elements.
x
: the optimized vectorstatus
: A status indicator: 0 means that the algorithm
converged to a solution. (1= not enough memory, 2= divergence detected,
3 = maximum nr of iterations exceeded)tol
A measure of how far the final vector lies from the
borders defined by the constaint (it is the L∞ distance to the valid
region).iterations
The number of iterations performed.duration
The amount of time elapsed during
optimization.objective
This is the weighted distance between the
start vector and the solution.For problems where a great many coeffiecients need to be optimized under a large number of restrictions, it is possible to forumate the restrictions in sparse format.
In the lintools
package, the row-column-coefficient
format is used. That is, in stead of defining the full matrix A as in the previous
example, we set up a data.frame
with columns
row
: the row numbercolumn
: the column numbercoef
: the coefficientOf course, only non-zero coefficients need to be listed.
As a -rather simple- example, we define the same problem as above, but now in a sparse manner.
A <- data.frame(
row = c(1,1,2,2)
,col = c(1,2,1,1)
,coef = c(1,-1,-1,-1)
)
b <- c(0,-1)
x <- c(0.8,-0.2)
Solving is done with the sparse_project
function.
## $x
## [1] 0.5 0.5
##
## $status
## [1] 0
##
## $eps
## NULL
##
## $iterations
## [1] 3
##
## $duration
## user system elapsed
## 0 0 0
##
## $objective
## [1] 0.7615773
We have been able to solve problems with up to ∼ 6 milion variables and hundreds of thousands of linear (in)equality restrictions with the algorithm as implemented in this package.
The sparse_project
function performs the following
steps:
Step 1 takes a little bit of time (not much) but if you need to do a lot of optimizations it may pay to do it once and reuse the representation. This can be done as follows, using the same definition of sparse constraints as in the previous subsection.
First, create an object of class sparse_constraints
.
Now, using its project
method, we can optimize from
multiple starting points, for example:
## $x
## [1] 0.5 0.5
##
## $status
## [1] 0
##
## $eps
## NULL
##
## $iterations
## [1] 3
##
## $duration
## user system elapsed
## 0 0 0
##
## $objective
## [1] 0.7615773
## $x
## [1] 0.5040358 0.4959642
##
## $status
## [1] 0
##
## $eps
## NULL
##
## $iterations
## [1] 26
##
## $duration
## user system elapsed
## 0 0 0
##
## $objective
## [1] 2.220643
The algorithm implemented here may have been invented a number of times. The earliest reference known to this author is
The method was more recently discussed in the context of restricted imputation methodology by
Users of the rspa
package will no doubt recognize the
algorithm and the sparse_constraints
object. We chose to
separate the functionality from rspa
to be able to reuse
the successive projection algorithm for multiple purposes, without
depending on the editrules
package. In the future,
rspa
will depend on lintools
with guaranteed
backward compatibility.